Author Topic: Whisk[e]y  (Read 9639 times)

micah

  • A real person, on the Internet.
  • Ass Wipe
  • Posts: 6915
  • Karma: +58/-55
  • Truth cannot contradict truth.
    • micahj.com
Whisk[e]y
« on: May 23, 2018, 01:53:08 AM »
I've always been a Jack Daniels fan, I like the other obvious big name bourbon brands like Knob Creek and Makers Mark. Tonight I bought some Bulleit which I'm enjoying neat.  (don't worry, everything in moderation)*

Its been a while since I've had Scotch, I've tried red and black jonny walker and dewers but I'm not really a fan.

What about you guys? recommendations?

*edit (an hour later): i'm not good atmoderation
« Last Edit: May 23, 2018, 02:52:09 AM by micah »
"I possess a device, in my pocket, that is capable of accessing the entirety of information known to man.  I use it to look at pictures of cats and get in arguments with strangers."

KnuckleBuckett

  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 8674
  • Karma: +26/-259
  • [url=http://google.com]I search a lot[/url]
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2018, 06:08:14 AM »
Beer.

hans

  • Guitar Addict
  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 3523
  • Karma: +46/-18
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2018, 11:32:51 AM »
Double Oak Woodford Reserve, no need to drink anything else.

But if you do, Bulleit Rye is better than their bourbon and great for mixing. Angel's Envy is pretty good and on a budget Four Roses Single Barrel can usually be had pretty reasonably. Regular Woodford is fine and I used to drink it often until I focused on the double oak. Old Forester is a pretty good value as well.

In the scotch world, if you're coming from bourbon, I'd go with something like Aberlour 12 or maybe Balvenie Doublewood if you can find it for a just a bit more than the Aberlour, they're both pretty similar profiles IMO.

And if you like the spicier knob creek, then old grand dad (100 proof bonded) might be a good change, heck in that spirit even the Trader Joe's Bourbon isn't terrible.

I've been through quite a few Bourbons so if you have a price range and profile you're looking for (what your favorite is) I can make some more targeted suggestions.
This signature intentionally left blank.

hans

  • Guitar Addict
  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 3523
  • Karma: +46/-18
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2018, 11:42:16 AM »
Also, I recommend the Old Grand Dad with some water or on ice since it's pretty hot neat. McKenna was pretty good when I tried it too but I also preferred it on ice.
This signature intentionally left blank.

ober

  • Ashton Shagger
  • Ass Wipe
  • Posts: 14305
  • Karma: +73/-790
  • mini-ober is taking over
    • Windy Hill Web Solutions
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2018, 09:10:17 PM »
Never been a fan of whiskey/bourbon.  Not huge on beer either but I will drink it socially.  I prefer to wine.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2018, 05:59:23 AM by KnuckleBuckett »

hans

  • Guitar Addict
  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 3523
  • Karma: +46/-18
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2018, 09:35:46 AM »
That one that taste like cinnamon

Fireball, and no, just no.
This signature intentionally left blank.

micah

  • A real person, on the Internet.
  • Ass Wipe
  • Posts: 6915
  • Karma: +58/-55
  • Truth cannot contradict truth.
    • micahj.com
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2018, 08:55:03 AM »
Yeah, no to cinnamon.

My price range generally is whatever is affordable. I like the $25-$35 price range but I'm willing to go a bit higher I think to try something that is noticeably better.  I should point out that I'm a fairly sporadic drinker, maybe once a month I'll have a few drinks. I only buy liquor a few times a year; mostly because I'm too cheap to justify the cost.

@tgm, I read up on that double oak woodford you mentioned. I might try that next time.  I generally don't mix whiskey in drinks, I prefer to sip it as is (usually on the rocks).  Gin and tonic, Rum and coke (kraken and rootbeer!), vodka and olive juice; all great mixes but for some reason I like whiskey as is.
"I possess a device, in my pocket, that is capable of accessing the entirety of information known to man.  I use it to look at pictures of cats and get in arguments with strangers."

micah

  • A real person, on the Internet.
  • Ass Wipe
  • Posts: 6915
  • Karma: +58/-55
  • Truth cannot contradict truth.
    • micahj.com
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2018, 01:15:31 AM »
the problem with expensive whiskey is that, if you drink a half bottle in one night, you're out a lot of money. like, you could just buy a 12pack of beer for $15 but if you buy a $45 bottle of whiskey and drink half of it, it likes you spent way more money.  On the other hand, its a lot less carbs then the equivalent amount of beer so I guess maybe its worth the extra cost.

My local store didn't have the "double oak" woodford reserve that tgm recommended but they had regular woodford reserve so I got that. I like it, very smooth and lots of distinguishable flavors. I'll have to shop around to see what I want to try next.
"I possess a device, in my pocket, that is capable of accessing the entirety of information known to man.  I use it to look at pictures of cats and get in arguments with strangers."

hans

  • Guitar Addict
  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 3523
  • Karma: +46/-18
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2018, 03:02:55 PM »
Regular Woodford is great, and for the $25-35 range (around here it's $23-$30 depending on the store) I think it's the best value. Double Oak is definitely worth it though, but probably better suited for a weekend sipper due to the price.

And man, if you're drinking half a bottle of 90 proof whiskey in a night, that might be a bit much. My preference is to treat Bourbon as a take your time kind of drink. Sip and enjoy.

If you like the Woodford, you might consider the slightly cheaper yet similar Old Forester 86.

And if you prefer on the rocks, consider something 100 proof. Generally I've found those open up nicely with with the ice.

I've been getting into Rye's lately and Woodford makes a good one of that too, but Bulleit is great value for money. And I've been experimenting with blending my Rye with Bourbon and so far I've been enjoying the results. I had a bottle of Hudson Bourbon (once again their Rye is much better) that's way too sweet corn for normal drinking but adding a bit of Bulleit Rye with it gives it an interesting character. I say don't be afraid to try blending a bit either.
This signature intentionally left blank.

hans

  • Guitar Addict
  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 3523
  • Karma: +46/-18
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2018, 04:44:42 PM »
Oh and if you haven't already found it:
The Whiskey Vault is a fun channel for reviews, more scotch I'd say but lots of whisky in general.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCElm866_W5r1eg8VjhFNARw/videos
This signature intentionally left blank.

micah

  • A real person, on the Internet.
  • Ass Wipe
  • Posts: 6915
  • Karma: +58/-55
  • Truth cannot contradict truth.
    • micahj.com
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2018, 06:25:01 PM »
to clarify, it apparently wasn't a half bottle - I was going to keep it to the neck and shoulders but over the course of a few hours had at least 1/4 of the bottle.  That was apparently enough though for me to misjudge how much I had  :D

my bottle of woodford was $39.99+tax at the place I usually go because I trust their prices.  I might shop around though next time.
"I possess a device, in my pocket, that is capable of accessing the entirety of information known to man.  I use it to look at pictures of cats and get in arguments with strangers."

hans

  • Guitar Addict
  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 3523
  • Karma: +46/-18
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2018, 06:51:31 PM »
Wow, that's really high relative to my area. What are are you in again? If you have a Total Wine anywhere around I know they're the cheapest around here. I know some areas are higher priced but that seems steep and I'd probably see about some other options maybe then. The Double Oak in my area is $43 - $52 so I'd definitely shop around.
This signature intentionally left blank.

micah

  • A real person, on the Internet.
  • Ass Wipe
  • Posts: 6915
  • Karma: +58/-55
  • Truth cannot contradict truth.
    • micahj.com
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2018, 07:07:56 PM »
I'll be damned, I got ripped off.  I just checked my receipt and it was actually $37.99 I paid (plus tax) but there is a total wine & more about 20 minutes from me and, according to their website, the sell it for $26.99.

Oh wait, they say they don't have it in stock there... the next closest store has it for $33.99.  So thats $4 cheaper.  I guess I only got ripped off a little bit.  :dunno:
"I possess a device, in my pocket, that is capable of accessing the entirety of information known to man.  I use it to look at pictures of cats and get in arguments with strangers."

hans

  • Guitar Addict
  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 3523
  • Karma: +46/-18
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2018, 12:57:18 AM »
Well, been sipping a bit more than usual tonight and have been trying the Knob Creek 120 proof, which while I can appreciate the taste better now than when I started drinking bourbon is still not really my thing. But coming off that to the Old Grand Dad 100 proof I get a lot of corn out of it and it's actually pretty nice for a budget one. Not nearly at sweet corn as the Hudson Baby but definitely in that same area. My first impressions were much spicier but I guess coming off the Knob Creek that mellows it out quite a bit. It's interesting sometimes how your palate can change like that based on what you've been drinking before. It'll be interesting to come back to it on its own or from something else next time.
This signature intentionally left blank.

hans

  • Guitar Addict
  • Jackass In Charge
  • Posts: 3523
  • Karma: +46/-18
Re: Whisk[e]y
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2018, 11:40:26 PM »
So I picked up a set of new stuff to try and have some initial impressions. I've been watching the "bourbon night" youtube channel a bit lately and have been inspired to do some of my own blind flight tastings and needed some options. I stuck to stuff that I thought I'd like so stuff like Maker's and such are still something to come later, I'm just not a huge fan of wheated bourbons.

Anyways tonight's arrivals are:

Jim Beam Double Oak
I don't recall drinking any Jim Beam in the past so this was a first for me. It was dirt cheap ($15) at the Total Wine nearby so it was more of a "why not" kind of purchase. It was also the same price as the white label and from what I've seen most people think they're similar with this being a bit smoother and a bit more character, but not much. I liked it, and if I needed to drink something at a bar with limited select this might work fine. It's very smooth and uneventful for me though. The flavor is fine and but it disappears fast and isn't memorable. Some people said it's a cheaper Woodford Double Oak but I wouldn't say they're close. Woodford DO is much richer and sweeter and has much more character and complexity. But for $15 it decent enough. Kind of reminds me a bit of Maker's from what I remember, smooth but uneventful. Good budget bourbon though, but I wish the finish lasted longer. Maybe that's intentional to get you to drink more though.

Clyde May's Straight Bourbon
This one reminded me of Knob Creek a bit, but better. It's got that same kind of kick to it in the profile but it's smoother and more rounded with the fruity hints. I think if Knob Creek is your thing this would be right up your alley and I'll probably end up keeping a bottle around to fill that spot. While the Knob Creek 120 I recently picked up was interesting, I like this one better in the spot. I still need to spend a bit more time with it though since it does seem to have a nice full body flavor to it and there's enough complexity in there that it might take some time to learn the nuances of. This was a direct snag from watching the Bourbon Night videos. It was available as a 375ml so I figured it was a bit less of a commitment in case it didn't turn out to be to my liking, and I'll have a nice smaller bottle for some self blends of other stuff later.

Old Forester 100
I've been looking for something to fill in the regular Woodford's spot since I'm kind of stuck on Double Oak now. Since these are from the same family of whiskies I figured it was worth a shot. The 86 is OK, but kind of boring. This is pretty good for about the same price as Woodford ($25). It's definitely got some kick to it and more body than the 86. It has some nice sweetness like the Woodford but definitely has more kick to it. I tried it with a little water and it held its own but I think I prefer neat. Ice might be good too. I'm sort of liking these 100 proofs lately though.

Old Forester 1920
The winner of the new arrivals and what I'm actually sipping on tonight. Even more body than the 100 proof and some cherry or something in the flavor. The nose is very nice on it and the taste delivers as well. You notice the high proof but it's very drinkable at the same time. It's a little hot going down but finishes long and lovely, it fades nice. It's odd but I get a hint of peanut butter out of it, like a couple other's I've had recently. It's like it starts out with corn notes and then moves over towards oily peanut butter, like the natural kind. Maybe that's what they mean by "nutty" I keep hearing them say.  It's a bit more spendy at just over $50 but should complement my Double Oak for when I'm looking to vary it up a bit. If I was trying to save some money though between all of the Old Foresters I've tried I think the 100 proof is the bang for buck, but this is my favorite. Perhaps the Statesman (I tried a few of the others in a tasting this Spring), but I think this one might be easier to find.


My wife said she'd help me setup a blind tasting flight so I can try and see how well I can guess the bourbons and do a less bias kind of assessment. I'm curious how well I'll do and how the order of them or what's in the group might affect what I think are my favorites. I'll keep you posted just how terrible of a whiskey sommelier I am, but I have hopes...
This signature intentionally left blank.