They're implying that the taser killed him without knowing for sure that he was even shot with one. If they want to point to tasers as the cause of death, they ought to have more information or everyone will jump on the headline and say that no one should use tasers because they're dangerous. For all we know, being tased has a 1% chance of killing you while being wrestled into handcuffs has a 2% chance of killing you.
The gravity of a death in custody or death in arrest cannot be taken lightly and it is a foundation of any democratic country that the press are well within their rights to report on these deaths. I can understand you concerns over an ensuing moral panic, but bear with me here.
The police
media report states clearly: "Police arrived at the scene about 2:50am. It is believed that a taser was deployed and that police managed to physically subdue the man, however before the ambulance could arrive at the scene the man stopped breathing."
So to say that a "man has died after being tasered by police" is a fact, I fail to see how you could write a less-impartial description of the event. The article I posted is perhaps the most reliable one I have found, short of the emotional debate.
Take for example one tabloid report:
"A junior constable only one year out of police college was one of the first officers on the scene of a fatal arrest in north Queensland early this morning that saw a man shot three times with a Taser stun gun."
This is almost pure, emotionally charged fiction. No such information has been confirmed by the police HQ.
Furthermore, the present lack of conclusive evidence regarding CED and fatalities is not a green light on their use. Ventricular fibrillation is clear risk identified in several
studies that I have found relating to CED fatalities. Electromuscular incapacitation (EMI) can occur as a result of drug or alcohol intoxication, and yes, there still remains a tenuous link between EMI and use of CEDs. Yet surely reason dictates that while the technology has any chance of causing or contributing to deaths in custody or deaths in arrest (when in fact, the primary idea behind using CEDs is to deter these avoidable deaths), it is going to make it very difficult to set how, when and why police should use CEDs.