EntropySink
Entertainment & Artistry => Photography/Video/Movies & TV => Topic started by: Steve on May 22, 2008, 11:45:47 PM
-
I REALLY liked this movie. Great acting, solid story line, and truely entertaining. It was fairly predictable, but it kept attention anyway. First movie in a long time that i truely enjoyed through and through.
9.5/10
-
We watched it last night and enjoyed it as well - 7.5/10
-
movie in a long time that i truely enjoyed through and through.
Dude the last three movies you rated you've given a 9, 8, and 10.
-
movie in a long time that i truely enjoyed through and through.
Dude the last three movies you rated you've given a 9, 8, and 10.
Right, and you quoted a post from may....
-
Whoa, my bad. I didn't even see that.
-
All good lol
-
Pure POS. I read the book first. 21 was fiction with vague references to reality. Very vague. It was a complete and utter failure in it's representation of the book. It should have been named differently and not associated with the book. BTW the book was great.
-
if you want a book, read a book. It's a movie about counting cards how accurate to the book does it really NEED to be? It's not like your talking bout LOTR here for christ sake.
-
I'm with KB, if you're going to do a movie based on a book, it must be verbatim damn it!!!
;)
-
Where are kids in the street to yell at when you need them?
-
Not everything you do in a book translates well (or at all) to the screen.
-
Yeah... but if it isn't a relatively faithful interpretation of the book, then it shouldn't really be marketed as based on that book.
(Note that I don't know if 21 the movie is marketed as being based on the book you guys are talking about.)
-
big difference between based on a book and being an interpretation of the book.
-
6/10 for me, saw this on a flight one time and was massively disappointed
I should've watched Vantage Point instead!
-
It isn't remotely like the book. I understand some things translate poorly, but this was a completely different story.